Pages Menu
RssFacebook
Categories Menu

Posted by on Nov 23, 2007

Apocalypse – The End of the Liturgical Year

Apocalypse – The End of the Liturgical Year

last-judgment-rubens.jpg

As we approach the feast of Christ the King, the cycle of readings reminds us of the end of days. Christianity is almost unique in its focus on the end and culmination of all things and the Second Coming of the Lord. The images are very different from the entry into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday. St. Stephen, the first martyr, sets the tone, declaring to his judges that the time is coming when they will see Christ descending on them in glorious judgment.

There were many books about the end of days published before the millenium. The biggest publishing success was the Left Behind series, a group of novels by Tim LeHaye and Jerry Jenkins. The series combined a literal approach to the Book of Revelation, also known by its Greek title, The Apocalypse, with a theology which came primarily from the tent revival meetings of the 20th century in the United States. There is a very strong dose of Calvinist predestination, Anabaptist altar calls to conversion, and Medieval delectatio morosa – delight in the suffering of the others, especially the damned.

Horror movies are always popular in American culture. Perhaps they are a secular celebration of evil that twists what is supposed to be the encouragement apocalyptic literature offers to those undergoing persecution. Of course there is the old technique of fire and brimstone sermons to scare the “hell” out of people. Apparently many people liked and still like the horror entertainment value of these sermons, which seem to create a god who is far from loving.

The end of the year and the beginning of the new year is a time to focus on more than the settling of scores. It is a time to show the mercy we want to receive on that Last Day.

Read More

Posted by on Nov 22, 2007

Apocalypse – The End of the Liturgical Year

Thanksgiving Day USA – Calvin’s Elect in the New World

thanksgiving-rockwell.jpg

Thanksgiving Day in the United States is observed on the fourth Thursday of November. It is a time for family gatherings. The day before the holiday is the busiest travel day in the year. In keeping with its Puritan religious origins, it is not a liturgical holiday, but rather a celebration of a successful harvest and the group’s survival of the brutal winter and spring. Generally, there are no formal religious services. It is a holiday observed by people of all faiths and of no faith. The poor are fed and the rush and loneliness of contemporary life are abandoned for the day. It is a sabbath. Offices, banks, schools, and most stores are closed. The day embodies a vision of the Kingdom, without any of the overt religiosity of the country’s Calvinist social and cultural founders.

The Pilgrims were a group from Nottingham Shire in England and were part of the Puritan movement. Their religious beliefs were generally in line with those of John Calvin. The recognized only two sacraments – Baptism and the Lord’s Supper. Marriage, as a civil contract, was the province of the magistrates. Marriage existed for the procreation of children and the prevention of adultery. There was no celebration of Christmas and Easter since these were the creations of human culture to honor Christ, who did not need them. They abandoned the liturgical cycle of seasons and holy days, to return to a “pure” Christianity of the very early Church. Their meeting places were not Churches in the traditional sense and had no decoration.

They believed that everyone was predestined to salvation or damnation. Due to the sin of Adam and the fall of the human race, humanity was seen as utterly corrupt. Some people would receive grace, which was irresistible. As a result they would come to faith and be saved. The Pilgrims – unlike the Anabaptists – emphasized the baptism of infants. God’s chosen or elect would probably come from the ranks of those people who led good lives, since they already manifested the sign of divine grace. Sobriety, industry, and the absence of adornment in one’s dress, home and public spaces was the norm. The English Puritans did not believe in the need for bishops or a formal hierarchy. Each group constituted its own church and elected its own officials.

When James I of England (James IV of Scotland) came to the throne, he supported the episcopal model of the Anglican Church, which maintained the hierarchical structure of the bishops. King James, who commissioned the English Bible that still bears his name, sought to bring Puritan groups like the Pilgrims into conformity with the Church of England. The Pilgrims used the Geneva (Calvinist) translation of the Bible and refused the English Book of Common Prayer because of their preference for one’s own prayers and their aversion to reading the prayers of others. King James feared that people who did not need bishops did not need a king. (The Puritan Revolution under Oliver Cromwell was to prove him right on this point.) The group’s escape from England to the Netherlands was as courageous as it was risky – not all of them made it. In the Netherlands they found whatever work they could to support themselves, but they realized that the continued influence of Spain in the area made their longer term presence untenable. The story of their arrangements for their voyage, the trip itself, and the first years is stunning in its complexity of politics, intrigue, and danger. The History Channel’s documentary, Desperate Crossings, presents the truly dramatic history of the group – a history which had been so obscured by myth and legend as to render the actors as two dimensional soul-less characters.

Thanksgiving is a day to give thanks for blessings and deliverance and a day to remember the country’s religious founders, whose beliefs have shaped and molded a secular state and a highly religious society.

Read More

Posted by on Nov 21, 2007

Apocalypse – The End of the Liturgical Year

Feast of the Day – Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary

presentation-bvm-icon.jpg

November 21 is the feast of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary. This feast is based on material from the Proto-Gospel of James – an apocryphal gospel that did not make it into the canon of scripture. Mary is presented in the temple at age 3 by her aging parents in fulfillment of a vow that they made.

This is an archetypal pattern of a very special child born to aged parents who is destined for great things by God. The birth of Isaac to Abraham and Sara is the first example. The birth of the prophet Samuel to Elkanah and Hannah comes about after the barren Hannah is told by Eli, the priest at Shiloh, that her prayer would be heard. In the New Testament, John the Baptist is born to Zachary and Elizabeth according to the promise of the angel. The feast of the Presentation appears to have come from Syria in the 6th century and became prominent in the West in the 11th century. However, the Presentation did not become a universal feast until the 15th century.

Although the four canonical gospels do not mention the Presentation, the devotion of the early Church to Mary as the Mother of God makes it easier to understand why there would be such a tradition. St. John the Baptist’s prominence is emphasized by the nature of his birth. Certainly, one might suspect that the apocryphal account would resonate with Christians as giving prominence to Mary and the importance of her role. While one could argue that the Annunciation is more than ample in terms of underscoring Mary’s importance, the Presentation can be seen as a reasonable corollary.

The Second Vatican Council (1961-1965), in its Dogmatic Constitution on the Church in the Modern World – Lumen Gentium – restated the ancient belief in Mary as our mother in the order of grace.

Predestined from eternity by that decree of divine providence which determined the incarnation of the Word to be the Mother of God, the Blessed Virgin was in this earth the virgin Mother of the Redeemer, and above all others and in a singular way the generous associate and humble handmaid of the Lord. She conceived, brought forth and nourished Christ. She presented Him to the Father in the temple, and was united with Him by compassion as He died on the Cross. In this singular way she cooperated by her obedience, faith, hope and burning charity in the work of the Savior in giving back supernatural life to souls. Wherefore she is our mother in the order of grace. (Lumen Gentium The Light of Nations chap 8, III,61)

Although we might have some reservations about the feast of the Presentation as a speculative notion by early Christians, there is a modern psychological explanation that underscores its development. Mary came from a devoted family who rejoiced at her birth because she was truly God’s answer to prayer for her parents. Such love, even in secular psychological terms, is always grace filled and grace giving.

Read More

Posted by on Nov 16, 2007

Apocalypse – The End of the Liturgical Year

Human Rights and Scripture – Jim’s Letter to Dr. Laura

lightning.jpg

Every once and a while a piece of internet apocrypha can be thought provoking. Of course diatribes against Dr. Laura Schlessinger, a physiologist who gives advice on proper human behavior, have become their own genre on the internet. Many of the Old Testament (Torah) behavior codes strike us today as inhuman and not at all in keeping with Jewish or Christian notions of justice and compassion. This is an interesting example.

“Why Can’t I Own a Canadian?”

October 2002
Dr. Laura Schlessinger is a radio personality who dispenses advice to people who call in to her radio show. Recently, she said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22 and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. The following is an open letter to Dr. Laura penned by a east coast resident, which was posted on the Internet. It’s funny, as well as informative:

Dear Dr. Laura:

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God’s Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the other specific laws and how to follow them:
When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord – Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness – Lev.15:19- 24. The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can’t I own Canadians?

I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination – Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don’t agree. Can you settle this?

Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? – Lev.24:10-16. Couldn’t we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God’s word is eternal and unchanging.

Your devoted fan,
Jim

Read More

Posted by on Nov 15, 2007

Apocalypse – The End of the Liturgical Year

Saint of the Day – St. Albert the Great

st-albert-the-great.jpg

November 15 is the feast of St. Albert the Great (c 1206 – 1280), the German Dominican who not only taught St. Thomas Aquinas, but established the basic pattern for uniting faith and reason that became medieval scholasticism. According to Pope John Paul II, of all the doctors of the Church, St. Albert alone bears the title of “the Great.” In his address at Cologne on November 15, 1980, the seven hundredth anniversary of the saint’s death, Pope John Paul II, in his address on “Science and Faith in the Search for Truth,” beautifully summarized St. Albert the Great’s legacy and the current challenge for Christian scholars to confront a transformed world.

Not only did he shape philosophy and theology for centuries to come, St. Albert the Great, along with Roger Bacon, helped to lay the foundations for experimental science. He is still acclaimed in the history of botany, geography, chemistry, and physics. St. Albert the Great demonstrated the sphericity of the earth – a concept that had been lost with the fall of Greco-Roman civilization. He emphasized the importance of experiments in the study of the natural sciences. In fact, he gave us the distinction between the philosophical and natural sciences that we still use today.

Eleventh century Europe was a time of tremendous change. Towns and cities emerged to challenge the feudal order of the previous centuries. Trade and communication spread across Europe once again. The great mendicant orders – the Franciscans and the Dominicans – re-evangelized Europe and set up centers of learning.

Perhaps what is most interesting in St. Albert the Great was his ability to think critically and teach others how to do it as well. He did not accept the teaching of authorities, whether it was Plato, Aristotle, or St. Augustine, without a critical evaluation. St. Albert the Great did accept the broad boundaries of approved Christian teaching or orthodoxy. He also showed that reason and experimental inquiry were not incompatible with faith. St. Albert the Great acknowledged the transcendence of God and that we as humans could go only so far with our gift of reason and observation until we came to the threshold of revelation. He did not challenge the reality of miracles, but he was more interested in what could be learned from the natural order of things, which is the way God works most of the time.

Paradoxically, many legends developed in later centuries about St. Albert as a sorcerer and magician, which were recounted by such a great philosopher as Hegel. In one legend, St. Thomas Aquinas throws a punch at a talking machine that St. Albert has invented. Because of these accounts, St. Albert the Great has been adopted by the New Age movement.

Although St. Albert the Great was one of the greatest theologians, philosophers, and scientists of the Western tradition, he was also a Dominican provincial superior, bishop, diplomat, administrator, and spiritual director. He wrote the first Summa Theologiae and provided the model for a reasoned exposition and defense of the faith. As much as he was a man of faith, St. Albert the Great was a great believer in the importance of reason and observation.

For those of us who have grown up with the official Catholic Thomism of the 20th century, it can be hard to imagine how radical St. Albert the Great and St. Thomas Aquinas were for their time. The critical study of Christian, Islamic, Jewish and ancient non-Christian thinkers was based on the notion that truth can be found everywhere. As basic as this might seem to us, it caused a lot of controversy. St. Albert the Great was criticized for not devoting himself to scripture and theology. “How could God be subject to reason?” What we were to believe and think as Christians had all been laid out in the scriptures, the Church Fathers (and Mothers), and the official pronouncements of the Church. Yet, the exigencies of that time of great change required some way to deal with the re-introduction of knowledge, information, and technology that had been lost for centuries.

There is no doubt that St. Albert the Great would be fascinated with the social, technological, and theological challenges of the early 21st century. Do we have his same bold faith?

There is a wonderful page of resources and links about St. Albert the Great. It is well worth perusing. For a special treat listen to Austeritate Vitae the special chant for the feast of St. Albert.

Read More

Posted by on Nov 14, 2007

Apocalypse – The End of the Liturgical Year

Italian Immigrants – Book Review: The Value of Worthless Lives

italian-immigrant-history-book.gif

In keeping with the feast day of St. Francis Cabrini – November 13 – this history of Italian immigrants in their own words gives an insight into a group of people who contributed much more to the world than their physical labor.

The Value of Worthless Lives
Writing Italian-American Immigrant Autobiographies
Ilaria Serra

Fordham University Press
244 pages
February 2007

The H-Net Discussion List on International Catholic History [H-CATHOLIC@H-NET.MSU.EDU] published a review by Anthony Riccio of the Sterling Library, Yale University here a couple of paragraphs:
Here we find captivating personal histories of miners who used their good fortunes to help immigrant schoolchildren buy books, political figures who wrote for justice, unskilled laborers who wrote with flair and expressiveness beyond their grammar-school education, a poet/laborer who memorized Webster’s dictionary, and a bricklayer who taught himself how to write and worked with quarantined immigrants at Ellis Island. One excerpt from miner Pietro Riccobaldi’s memoir captures the ethos of the Italian immigrant, the deep sense of family honor and the importance of the family name that formed the basis of a behavioral code Italian immigrants brought from Italy: “I didn’t gather big fortunes, but I have behaved well. I kept faithful to my family’s teachings–I felt a sense of pride”

In chapter 4, “The Spiritual Immigrant,” Serra illuminates another fascinating aspect of the Italian immigrant experience that resulted from the religious freedom America afforded. Serra’s work examines the transformation from the constraints of Old World Catholicism practiced in the Italian village to personal inner journeys and flights to higher spiritual awareness experienced in the New World. Serra’s autobiographies profile the lives of men whose inward pilgrimage led them to become Protestant ministers, evangelicals who returned to their native Italian villages to preach the word of God, and missionaries who converted souls to Catholicism in the American wilderness.

Read More

Posted by on Nov 14, 2007

Apocalypse – The End of the Liturgical Year

What’s in A Word? – To Divorce and Forgive?

forgiveness-day.jpg

R. Rafael Pozos – my oldest son, string bassist, web programmer, and linguist – had an interesting comment on my post about Evangelicals rethinking divorce.

“Interestingly enough, Greek uses the same verb ‘aphiami’ for divorce and to forgive. It implies a very forceful leaving or remission. It’s what the apostles do to their boats and to their families when they go to follow Jesus, as well as what happens when a man dismisses his woman (no term for wife in antiquity really) , and also when an obligation is dismissed. Therefore, it is one loaded word.”

Read More

Posted by on Nov 13, 2007

Apocalypse – The End of the Liturgical Year

Saint of the Day – St. Frances Cabrini

st-frances-cabrini.jpg

November 13 is the feast day of St. Francis Cabrini (1850 -1917), the patron saint of immigrants. She was born in northern Italy, in the province of Lombardy, and was one of 13 children. Her desire to become a nun was put on hold because of health problems. St. Frances devoted herself to caring for her parents and working with her brothers and sisters on the farm. She was asked to teach in a school by the local bishop. After six years, the bishop asked her to start the Missionary Sisters of the Sacred Heart to care for poor children. St. Frances was known for her administrative and leadership abilities and Pope Leo XIII asked her to extend her work to the United States for the care of Italian immigrants.

There is a lot more to the story of a woman whose frail health put her in the circumstances of founding her own order at the age of 30. She established orphanages, hospitals, and schools in the United States, Central America, South America, Spain and France. The complete story is available at www.mothercabrini.org. St. Frances Cabrini never made it to China, which had been a long time dream. She made it as far as Seattle and California and had hopes of setting up programs in Alaska. At age 67, her health finally gave out and she died on December 22, 1917, in her room at the Columbus hospital in Chicago, while preparing candy for children.

Italians were forced to migrate for economic reasons. As displaced rural farmers, they brought little money, skills, or education with them. Their intention was to make money and return home. About 25% of Italian immigrants did return to Italy. For the most part they lived in dire poverty, in the worst of living conditions, and worked as manual laborers. By 1890, 90% of New York City’s public works employees were Italian, as were 99% of Chicago street workers. There were no social, health, or educational services for immigrants. They also encountered ethnic bigotry and religious prejudice.

The parallels with the current Mexican immigration to the United States are striking. In fact, St. Frances Cabrini opened programs in California for Mexican immigrants. The major difference is that Italian immigrants were documented and had a legal status. Although legal status is an issue for many Mexican immigrants, according to the San Jose Mercury News, 70% of persons of California’s Mexican community – 7.6 million of the state’s 36 million people – are United States citizens. While more social programs are available to immigrants with legal status, there are still great needs in housing, health care, employment protection, and nutrition.

In today’s global society, similar situations exist all around the world. The feast of St. Frances Cabrini is a good day to remember that prayer, work, and the desire to help the less fortunate can turn a person of frail health into a giant of Christ’s charity.

Read More

Posted by on Nov 12, 2007

Apocalypse – The End of the Liturgical Year

Saint of the Day – St. Josaphat Kuncevyc: East Meets West?

st-josaphat.jpg

November 12 is the feast day of St. Josaphat of Polotsk. St. Josaphat was born John Kuncevyc (Kunsevich) in 1580 or 1584 in Lithuania. He was a successful merchant and an advantageous marriage seemed imminent, when young John Kuncevyc decided to follow a religious vocation. This might have been remarkable enough in itself except that he decided to become a priest in a formerly Eastern Orthodox church that had re-united with Rome in 1596. The Union of Brest led to the entry of millions of Ukrainians and Belorussians in what was then Poland-Lithuania into union with Rome, but preserved many of their customs and forms of worship in the Byzantine Rite. The people were actually called Ruthenians, which is a Latinism for Russian. This act of union actually caused a serious split among the Ruthenians, since the decision was made by their key bishops at a time when the area was under the control of Catholic Poland. Many people and priests were actually opposed to giving up their Orthodox heritage.

St. Josaphat – the name he was given at his religious profession as a monk – came of age and was killed in the maelstrom of Cossack, Polish, and Austrian struggles for dominance in eastern Europe. The Catholic view, as presented by the Catholic Encyclopedia of 1907, is that the Orthodox Church had become so corrupt that key bishops felt that the only hope of reform was to leave their affiliation with the Patriarch of Constantinople and place themselves under the Patriarch of Rome, the Pope. The Ukrainian Orthodox view is that religious affiliation was part of nationhood and Poland sought more effective control of Ukraine and Belorussia by “Latinizing” them.

It is interesting to note that although, the Uniate bishops negotiated an agreement with Rome which required little change from their traditional form of worship and organization, western influence became strong, even among the Orthodox, because of the dominance of western education among the ruling elite and the higher clergy. St. Josaphat became a bishop and later archbishop of Polotsk in the eye of a political and cultural hurricane. He was a man of great holiness and learning and he was also a Catholic partisan. Unfortunately, because he did not adopt the Latin Rite, Polish bishops distrusted him. Those members of the Ruthenian public and clergy who resisted the union did not look favorably upon him.

Mattters were made more difficult by the appointment of rival Orthodox bishops. The support of the Polish King for the Uniate bishops, including St. Josaphat, and the removal of the Orthodox bishops by the Polish Crown, only increased the tension.

St. Josaphat made substantial gains in catechizing and reforming the clergy. He also led by his own example. However, his personal austerity became an obstacle. It was a testament to his courage and his commitment to communication that he returned to Vitebsk in October 1623 to address the unrest. St. Josaphat and his staff were attacked by a mob outside his residence and he was killed. The actual heroes of the day were the Jewish community, who moved in to prevent more deaths and break up the fighting. The Catholic side points out that this violence actually helped swing more support for the Uniates. While the Orthodox side regrets the killings, they point out the martyrdom of Athanasius Filipovich, who was tortured and killed by Catholic partisans in 1648.

Given all of this tragedy, what is the best way to achieve Christian unity? How can millions of people overcome centuries of political and cultural conflict and theological differences? Four hundred years after the Union of Brest and over a decade after the fall of the Soviet Empire, Catholic and Orthodox in eastern Europe are still far apart. Perhaps before the next century comes to an end, we will find a way to reach beyond the division, to communicate with respect, love, and repentance, and to build a new united future in which neither Christian tradition is denied or diminished.

Read More

Posted by on Nov 11, 2007

Apocalypse – The End of the Liturgical Year

Saint of the Day – St. Martin of Tours

st-martin-of-tours-icon.jpg

November 11 is the feast day of St. Martin of Tours (c.316 – c.397). We know very little of most of the early saints. Fortunately, Sulpicius Severus wrote the saint’s biography before St. Martin died. St Martin was born into a Roman military family in what is now Hungary and was named for the god of war, Mars. Martin’s father, a tribune, was transferred to Pavia, Italy, where the young man encountered the recently legalized religion of Christianity that was still a very small movement. Martin became a catechumen and was preparing for baptism. At the age of 15 he was required to join the army and became part of a distinguished cavalry unit. The famous story of his cutting his military cloak in half to clothe a beggar in Amiens, in what is now France, shows an emerging sense of his Christian vocation, which led to his unwillingness to kill men in battle. This pacifist position was not unusual in the early Church. St. Martin left the army and not only became a Christian, but also went to be a disciple of St. Hilary, the bishop of Poitiers, who was known for his holiness and learning.

The Arians – an heretical group which believed that Christ had not existed from eternity “there was a time when he was not” – had gained substantial strength in Gaul (present day France) and forced St. Hilary into exile in the East. (The emperor Constantine was baptized on his death bed by an Arian priest.) St. Martin returned to his parents’ home in Lombardy in northern Italy. However, the region was a stronghold of Arianism and St. Martin fled to the island of Gallinaria (now Isola d’Abenga) in the middle of the Tyrrhenian Sea, which is west of southern Italy.

When St. Hilary was recalled from exile by order of the emperor, St. Martin returned to Poitiers in 361. He asked St. Hilary if he could live near Liguge, which was not far from Poitiers, as hermit as he had done on Gallinaria. Eventually, other men were attracted by his example and they formed a community which would later become a Benedictine Abbey. (St. Benedict of Nursia would not be born for another 19 years in 480.) In this early monastic community, the monks lived in caves, shared all things in common, and neither bought nor sold anything. They assembled for the liturgy and meals but otherwise lived in their caves.

Periodically, St. Martin would travel in central and western Gaul, evangelizing people in the countryside. The places he visited later became popular places for pilgrims to visit on their way to the shrine of St. James the Apostle in Compostela, Spain. In 371 or 372, when the second bishop of Tours, St. Lidorius, died, St. Martin resisted the request of the people of Tours to become their bishop. He was literally tricked into it when he agreed to visit a dying woman at the pleading of her husband. When St. Martin got to Tours, he was acclaimed bishop by the people. St. Martin still persisted in his monastic lifestyle by setting up a small hermitage outside of Tours – Montmartier – that would become a larger monastery than Liguge.

While he paid primary attention to Tours, St. Martin would also travel outside his diocese as necessary. On more than one occasion, he went to Trier, in present day Germany, which at the time was the capital of western empire. He went to ask for clemency for condemned criminals in his diocese. St. Martin also asked the emperor to release bishop Priscillanus of Avila ( in present day Spain) to the jurisdiction of Church authorities. Priscillanus had been found guilty of heresy in absentia by the Synod of Saragossa. He and his followers essentially held that the true Christian life had to be that of the celibate monk. Pricillanus’ views appeared to echo those of gnosticism and Manicheanism, which downplayed the value of the physical world and placed the universe in a contest between equally strong forces of good and evil. Although St. Martin had been assured that Priscillanus would be returned to the church’s jurisdiction, the Spanish bishop, Ithacius, got the decision reversed. Priscillanus and his key followers were beheaded. This was the first time that Christians were killed for heresy. St. Martin protested and refused to have anything to do with Ithacius. However, when St. Martin approached the emperor to spare the lives of two rebels, the emperor said he would only do it on the condition that St. Martin would be reconciled to Ithacius. St. Martin complied in order to save the men’s lives, but always regretted the action as a moment of weakness. He died in 397.

The traditional image of St. Martin cutting his cloak to share it with a beggar is only a very small part of his story. His act of charity doesn’t appear to capture the meaning of his vocation and the effect that he would have on the church. In St. Martin we see the model of the monk as Bishop, teacher, and advocate. The selection of a hermit by the people to be bishop would be repeated with St. Augustine bishop of Hippo and many others. St. Martin’s efforts to evangelize the countryside as monk, and later as bishop, would become a model for centuries to come. His combination of learning, holiness, and zeal for the simplicity of the Christian life would be an ideal that Christians and non-believers would adopt in evaluating church officials.

Today we might have some reservations about the elimination of pre-Christian religions, lack of religious tolerance, and the union of church and state. However, we see these things from the long trajectory of Christian history, with a post-modern sensibility. We might take heart in St. Martin’s zeal if for no other reason than our need of some energy in the post-modern malaise.

st-martin-of-tours-cloak.jpg

Read More